Banana Fish and Anitwitter Discourse – Summary and Thoughts

BAFISH0006

Spoiler warnings for Banana Fish, content warning for rape, pedophilia, sexual assault, and sexual trauma

This week was marked by Anitwitter discourse about Banana Fish and BL. An article by Gabriella Ekens on Banana Fish and a history of BL has since been taken down for revisions (but is still viewable via Wayback Machine). It began with a few flippant opening paragraphs about Banana Fish and BL fandom (Gabby later clarifies BL is something she enjoys). It was dismissed notably by calling the first three paragraphs of the article out for chastising women for getting sexual enjoyment from it, orientalist for being self-deprecating and ironic while enjoying BL, misogynist and biased against women and not actual criticism.

My position on Banana Fish is that I am rooting for Ash and Eiji (they deserve all the happiness they can get) but I know it has quite a few problems because of when it was created including racism, homophobia, and the problematic implication that sexual trauma led Ash to be gay. (I agree with what’s laid out in the article itself, in AniFem’s reviews of the first episode as well as ANN’s weekly coverage)

BananaFish0098

I strongly disagree with the statement that it’s “an article that chastises women for daring to get sexual enjoyment out of media” when the actual sexual situations are almost exclusively negatively charged by either ogling Ash or traumatizing him, whether it’s through the leering shots of Ash in pain in the anime, being sexually harassed and assaulted by Marvin, Golzine, Garvey or Bull, or his history having been sexually abused by a war veteran when he was 8 and being victim-blamed. This statement is incredibly ignorant of what actually happens in the story, presuming it isn’t defending getting sexual enjoyment out of rape and sexual assault. Sexual acts have only ruined Ash’s life. This is precisely why no sexual relationship and an emotional connection between Ash and Eiji is what Akimi Yoshida wanted to portray, as acknowledged in an interview round-table with her. Also, when viewing the presence of sexual trauma from the perspective of Akimi Yoshida exploring her own experiences and thoughts about sexual trauma through Ash, it’s clear why the story is rife with it.

Being critical of the problematic content in Banana Fish (and in BL that have also prominently featured lack of consent and rape) while still appreciating Banana Fish’s core relationship is not orientalist or misogynist, it’s taking Akimi Yoshida’s personal context and evaluating what it’s saying from her perspective for women. It shares being a space for women to explore sexuality (both positively and negatively) in common with other BL, which Gabby noted in her article concerning BL scholar Akiko Mizoguchi’s observations in her dissertation.

Because Akimi Yoshida confirms that sex doesn’t play a part between Ash and Eiji, the first statement doesn’t hold up. Because the article itself acknowledges the significance of BL as a space for women, the second statement doesn’t hold up. Saying the article is ‘not criticism’ is false. All that’s left after that is calling out the tone of the first three paragraphs of the article which Gabby admits you can think what you want about on it’s own, but taking it out of context was what caused the misconceptions outlined in this post.

Links:

Akimi Yoshida roundtable interview

Jacob Chapman’s thread about the interview

Gabriella’s article via Wayback Machine

Gabby’s clarification that she’s a BL fan

Abel’s first thread, including the ‘chastising women’ remark

Abel’s second thread, including the orientalist and misogynist accusations (after learning Gabby’s clarification)

Banana Fish and Anitwitter Discourse – Summary and Thoughts

Capriccio of Fantasy & Power: The Silly Brilliance of Dance with Devils

The Josei Next Door

This ain’t the same old bad boy love song.

dwd-ed

Speaking in the broadest of terms, fiction can serve two primary functions: As a way to reflect reality, or as a way to escape it. Some people describe this as “art” versus “entertainment,” which never quite sat right with me because it suggests a certain lack of value to the latter, which is (to use a fancy lit-crit term) silly. Escapism absolutely has value. Have you lived in the world? Reality is stressful and messy. While it’s a bad idea to flee it altogether, it’s perfectly healthy, even necessary, to take a break from it sometimes.

View original post 1,678 more words

Capriccio of Fantasy & Power: The Silly Brilliance of Dance with Devils

No Middle Sliders: Body Diversity in Anime

I Have a Heroine Problem

When I lived in Japan, I rarely bought clothing. At 5’4” and 140 pounds, I was on the smaller side of average for an American woman, but finding clothes that fit, let alone flattered, my hips or shoulders was a chore to find at best and a self-esteem-destroying battle at worst. The only jacket I bought there is size XL and is loose everywhere but the shoulders. The story was the same for most of my foreign female coworkers, and we generally did all our clothes shopping on visits to our home countries. It was frustrating, but it was just one of those things you have to learn to deal with when living in a foreign country.

As an American feminist, body positivity and the struggle for diverse bodies to be respected and represented in the media is a huge issue. However, when I’m watching anime, it’s probably one of…

View original post 961 more words

No Middle Sliders: Body Diversity in Anime